[identity profile] rusty_halo.livejournal.com
I'm one of those newbies who is just watching old Who for the first time. Naturally I'm starting with the Master's episodes. I was very impressed with the ho!yay in "The Claws of Axos," so I wrote a screencap review.

It's here if anyone is interested. Heavy on the crack and ho!yay as suits the episode.
[identity profile] gritsinmisery.livejournal.com
Cross-posted at my main blog. Yeah, this is a bit OT for this comm. But my main blog is f-locked down pretty hard, and y'all are people I want to hear from, anyway. WARNING: Spoilers through the end of Nu-Who series 4.

Let's talk about Jenny )
ext_8938: (DW Master (snowgrouse))
[identity profile] versaphile.livejournal.com
I have a theory of why the Master's plans of conquest have a tendency to be oddly unfinished. Why they're often more about making the Doctor squirm than actually achieving any kind of genuine power.

It's because if he did achieve real power... )
[identity profile] silver-trails.livejournal.com
I am still trying to understand how the comm works, as I always seem to be watching another Classic Who. I posted this meta about the First Doctor in my writing LJ:

http://tati24.livejournal.com/128425.html

I know he only meets the Master on screen in one of the movies (I have a fic about that), but he is the Doctor the Master met in the Academy, even if now he is old and cranky (g)
[identity profile] x-losfic.livejournal.com

ALSO: WEDNESDAY'S EP IS MIND OF EVIL. WATCH IT AND PARTICIPATE. YOU WILL FEEL PLEASED YOU DID. YOU WILL FEEL CHERISHED, VIOLATED AND MIND-PARASITE-ED--NO. NO WAIT, THAT'S THREE.

[identity profile] x-losfic.livejournal.com
June Challenge: Three/Delgado!Master
Due first Sunday of July!



Given that we're still in the land of Confusing Old Skool, his month brings with it yet another breakdown/shippers manifesto for your convenience!

Fewer people have seen these episodes, so the summaries are more comprehensive. Am I hoping you'll be intrigued and go watch them yourself? No. No I wrote all this for my personal amusement. ...Go watch the damn episodes already. ;p

Plus since this runs long, I can just pillage it for the ship_manifesto. Multitasking! Woot!

If you have other highlights/observations re: the pairing, please do tell in comments!

Three Era: Terror of the AutonsThe Mind of EvilThe Claws of AxosColony in SpaceThe DæmonsThe Sea DevilsThe Time MonsterFrontier in Space




[identity profile] x-losfic.livejournal.com
So a few days ago [personal profile] bagheera_san was wondering if her Master-related meta was appropriate to the com: in my opinion, there's no need for us to confine ourselves too strictly to *specifically* D/M meta, because meta about either of them is obviously related to the com's general theme, and of potential interest to all of us--we're small enough that any and all meta is cool, as long as it's not 'my Doctor/Rose de profundis, let me show you it.' I even made you a little 'meta' tag!

If you're doing meta/episode summaries/whatever that you think would be of interest to the com on your personal lj or if you see it somewhere else, please feel free to link it here with that tag!

Meta

Jun. 1st, 2008 08:42 pm
[identity profile] bagheera-san.livejournal.com
Now, this is perhaps not quite the right community for this bit of meta, since it doesn't actually have anything to do with Doctor/Master as a pairing - but we do all love the Master, right? And we're good at discussing things.

If you look at the Master's history throughout Who, wow, does that guy go through a lot of transformations. And I don't mean the "usual", regeneration kind. Crispy!Master, possessing a Traken body, shrinking, turning into a cheetah and then an ectoplasmic green snake, dying, ressurrecting, turning human, turning Time Lord again, dying again and let's not forget Shalka!Master's life as a domestic android. Aside from being evil and stalking the Doctor, this is his most consistent theme. Somehow, this gave me the crazy idea that you could actually have a

Posthumanist Reading of the Master

In the beginning [War Chief or Delgado!Master], the Master is a very traditional villain. Evenly matched with the hero, what distinguishes him are his morals, or lack thereof. But as the show progresses, he begins to straddle the line between "villain" and "monster", "human" (if we accept Time Lords as stand-ins for humans) and "post-human".

A story of contamination and transformation )
[identity profile] x-losfic.livejournal.com
Discussion Time, Anon Meme Update, Shipper's Manifesto and New Monthly Challenge* in ONE!

*Due to how I am a lazy slacker who only got this up today, the due date for this one is June 5 rather than June 1 as it would normally be.

May Challenge: Five/Ainley!Master


This will be our first forray into classic Who for a challenge. I'm aware that not everyone's watched all of that, but as we have either the uploaded  relevant files or links to  all the episodes on the page you'll find referenced in the Links section, I feel reasonably confident that everyone has access to Five/Ainley!Master goodness.

But Old Skool can be a little intimidating, so here's a breakdown/shippers manifesto for your convenience!

If you have other highlights/observations re: the pairing, please do tell in comments!

Five Era: CastrovalvaTime-FlightThe King's DemonsThe Five DoctorsPlanet of Fire Caves of Androzani*

*Just for a second, and it's all in Five's head, but god, is he ever the nexus of the emotional arc in that one

Anon Meme )
 

[identity profile] prettyarbitrary.livejournal.com
I've been mulling it over ever since I saw the season finale, what the Doctor is forgiving the Master for. After all, they've got so much history, right? It could mean just about anything and everything. It could be, as many fans seem to take it, a sweeping statement of universal forgiveness for all the Master's activities, because after all being the only ones left (and being the guy who blew up all the others) could put a lot of things into perspective.

And yet while I find that a very satisfying interpretation in many ways, it never sat right with me, for several reasons. 1: It's not like the Doctor to say, "It's okay that you've cut swathes of destruction across the universe and killed literally countless numbers of people." 2: It's not exactly the first time the Doctor has blown up whole species or planets out of necessity, so why should he have the sudden epiphany now? 3: Doing so would be ignoring who and what the Master is: a nature which the Doctor is, of all beings, the most familiar with. 4: Reading it that way implies, it seems to me, a certain awareness of Old Who that Davies hasn't been in the habit of assuming on the part of fans thus far. 5: It would be sloppy writing. Not to say this doesn't happen, but it's just sloppy to throw in significant phrases like that without some kind of firm (even if indirect) indicator of what it refers to.

I think most of us understandably want something substantial to chew on. It'd be great to get a significant peek at the Master's psychology, and having the Master back on screen after so long, gosh, of course we're gunning for some character development for him. Who wouldn't like to see his deep and meaningful reaction to the whole Time War business?

But after watching those episodes what may admittedly be a few times too many, I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that we don't get it. I think we get something a lot more trite than that: that we're meant to read the Master's notable emotional instability as stemming from his (admittedly unaccustomed) feelings of guilt over running away from the war, and the Doctor is simply forgiving the Master for doing so.

Now, that wouldn't necessarily be all bad, I suppose, because it's still saying something if the Master, who once accidentally destroyed about 1/4 of the universe without being too fussed (he had enough left to keep playing about in), has trouble coming to terms with abandoning Gallifrey in her hour of need. And there's the "saving the Master" aspect. The Doctor might mean nothing more than helping the Master get over the initial throes of debilitating reaction, but alternatively the sheer possibility of the Master feeling bad about it could certainly be enough to open the Doctor up to the option of redeeming him (and for long-time fans, it wouldn't be the first time the Doctor's thought like that). It's less than satisfactory in the sense that if this is really what's up, then it's barely even touching on the Master's real responses, because all it's really dealing with is the initial burst of trauma and not any of the good, chewy long-term bits underneath--if in fact he has any, because the Master almost blew up Gallifrey himself once, and he didn't care much then. He might've been more upset about the thought of the Daleks winning than of the Time Lords losing; the Daleks weren't much more fond of him than they were of the Doctor.

Of course, it's also possible that "I forgive you" was shorthand for, "Hey, the other last Time Lord whom you've consistently screwed over from one end of time to the other does not in fact hate you, and you are not alone in the universe if only you'd sit down to talk long enough to finish some muffins and a nice cup of tea." Which again: sloppy. But then much as I love Who, I can't say this would be the first shocking! instance of sloppy writing to show up in the scripts.

So y'know. What do you all think?

Profile

best_enemies: (Default)
Best Enemies

October 2012

S M T W T F S
  1234 56
789101112 13
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 02:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios